Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2007 22:46:28 GMT -5
Well lack of opportunity has never stopped some supporters at naming suspects.
The puzzling parts, especially of Mara's report is Pam Hobbs alledgedly saying she didn't trust the prosecution. When I questioned her about why her BB announced change of heart had not been made public in mainstream news, she claimed they were sitting on the story??? And her posts were very attacking towards nons.
It is just odd behavior to accuse the people who have supported her for years, regardless of any "inside" information she thought she had. Sounds very paranoid as if she thinks everyone conspired to cover something up!
rh
|
|
|
Post by kma367 on Jul 19, 2007 19:15:59 GMT -5
Pam has probably been talking to Chase, and we know she's been talking to the ARWar folks. Those people are as bad as some other people Randy and I know when it comes to "convincing" the families to believe and support their agendas, rather than supporting the families and keeping their opinions to themselves.
Pam and Terry also went through a very, very bitter divorce and there are a lot of behind the scenes things that happened that explain Pam's animosity toward Terry, as well as his animosity toward her.
Pam's alleged lack of trust in the prosecution 14 years ago sounds more like a self-serving statement than an actual representation of history. I could say I never trusted certain nons, but that wouldn't be true. Unfortunately, there was a period of time when I did trust them and paid the price.
kma367
|
|
|
Post by abs on Jul 20, 2007 22:14:08 GMT -5
I am not quite prepared to only see Pam as "Flaky". She was there that day. At work. She feels bad that Terry Hobbs did not inform her that her son was missing. She says five hours, I can see four hours, but still that is something. Have to say something more about Pam, already did, but I will again: Pam did not want that we saw the boys in their deaths. That is not "flaky". That is a person saying Stop. No More of this. I think that shows a person standing up. Not "Flaky". Pam was the only parent who actually did that. Don´t call her "flaky".
|
|
|
Post by abs on Jul 20, 2007 22:27:35 GMT -5
Chase? What does Chase know? Are you serious?
|
|
|
Post by kma367 on Jul 20, 2007 23:03:10 GMT -5
She claims to know a lot. Whether she actually knows or not is open to debate.
And she's certainly in a lot of people's business and has been for many, many years. I know this first hand, as I've been a victim of her snooping.
Like a lot of people involved on the supporter side, she has an agenda, i.e. freeing 3 killers even if she has to lie to do it.
Chase tried to cozy up to Mark. She tried to cozy up to the Moores. She's cozied up to Pam. Do the math.
kma367
|
|
|
Post by abs on Jul 20, 2007 23:28:13 GMT -5
This is not about chase. It is about justice for three little boys. Chase doesn´t matter here.
|
|
|
Post by abs on Jul 20, 2007 23:37:04 GMT -5
Why would she do that? That´s my math.
|
|
|
Post by abs on Jul 21, 2007 0:32:25 GMT -5
Where was Terry Hobbs during those hours? If nothing, I would like to eliminate him from the list of suspects. So should the police have done back then?
|
|
|
Post by kma367 on Jul 21, 2007 14:27:10 GMT -5
Until he picked up Pam, he was babysitting their daughter, Amanda. Do you think she's an accomplice to the murders of her brother and his friends, just as supporters thought Melissa and Ryan were accomplices when they blamed Byers?
Later he spent the night searching with Pam's father and brother, along with the rest of the neighborhood. I suppose you believe they're accomplices, too.
kma367
|
|
|
Post by abs on Jul 24, 2007 21:58:45 GMT -5
How do you know that?
|
|
|
Post by kma367 on Jul 24, 2007 22:23:10 GMT -5
What's your point, Abs?
You're entitled to your opinion. Rugs, Randy and I are entitled to mine.
As you can see from the other thread, something Pam obviously hasn't considered is that if Terry could have been involved in the murders, so could she and her father and brother, since the supporter theories of the murders place them and the alleged dumping of the bodies at a time when Pam was not at work and her father and brother were involved in the search for the boys and, at one time, in the area of the ditch.
kma367
|
|